04 Nov 2010 | Person To Person

Scottish Mortgage - Investment and Conviction 

Scottish Mortgage - Investment and Conviction
Transcript (pdf) Comments (2)

Tom Slater, the new deputy manager of Scottish Mortgage talks to Heather Farmbrough about investment and conviction.

Sitting over a coffee in a cafe in Edinburgh with Tom Slater, deputy manager of the Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust PLC since February this year, I discover that the brand new batteries for my tape recorder do not work. “Do you do this kind of interview often?” he asks. “I suppose so”, I reply, wondering what he is getting at. “Why?”

“Well,” he says, “two of my colleagues recently went to Singularity University in the USA, which addresses some of the planet’s most pressing problems by understanding the development of exponentially advancing technologies, and were given audio recording pens. I was thinking that one might be very useful for you.”

Tom’s colleague later lends me a Livescribe Echo Smartpen. It may be relatively low-tech compared with some of Scottish Mortgage’s investments but it has a whiff of James Bond about it. However, the mention of Singularity University kicks off a conversation about the impact of developing technology on computing and genetics – Tom read maths and computer sciences at Edinburgh University - to challenges and opportunities created by immigration and education. He knows a little about the latter as his mother was head of a secondary and further education college.

We discuss the idea that as change happens, the pace accelerates. Think of the speed of economic development in China, add the implications of technological change and compare this with the UK’s industrial revolution. For a fund manager, what matters is how this is applied to investment decisions. “If we can invest in the beneficiaries of change, then the returns are so much larger,” answers Tom. “If you look at two of our Chinese stocks - Baidu, the Internet search engine or Tencent, which is an Internet community built around messaging and gaming - then I think the principle of exponential growth does apply.”

TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE
Since James Anderson became manager, Scottish Mortgage has moved a long way from its UK market bias to the current, more streamlined, global portfolio, which reflects James’ and Tom’s belief in the future importance of China, technology and technological change, and conviction that the western financial system remains flawed. This is a logical but bold view. Does that make it risky? “We do think about the concentration of risk within the portfolio,” answers Tom. “We ask what strong ideas we have – like our views on the financial system – and how this would expose us to risk if we were wrong. It challenges us to test our views.”

However, there is a big difference between risk and volatility. “We accept volatility in share prices,” Tom says. “But risk is missing that while the UK and US have stodgy economic growth, the global economy could grow at a rate almost unprecedented in history. If we are tied to the idea that other faster growing economies are more risky than investing in the UK or US, we run the risk of missing the bigger picture”

Tom has encouraged James to follow his convictions further, particularly in China, where the trust has increased its holdings in Chinese stocks, such as CTrip, the domestic travel-booking agency. He has also been behind other share purchases, such as America Latina Logistica, the privatised railway company operating in Brazil, and FLIR Systems, which provides infrared cameras, and thermal imaging for security cameras and energy leaks. The potential is considerable, he says. “Why do building security cameras only function during the hours of daylight? Why don’t we allow people to see hazards in the road beyond the range of their headlights? Why don’t law enforcers or fire-fighters have the ability to see in the dark? These are examples of how we can profit from anticipating change happening.”

POWER OF INDIVIDUALITY
What happens if he and James were to disagree? Tom considers. “James is intolerant of sloppy thinking or ill-thought through arguments. If you bring your own prejudices to something he can be very challenging. I hope he gets something out of my challenging his views.”

Tom also has his own part of the trust, in which he can buy shares he believes in even if James does not. “I’ve never believed in either group decision making or the veto approach,” James tells me later. “It’s much more about unusual ideas that can make you multiples of money, and this is a way of achieving this.”

Walking back to the office, we chat about Tom’s ten-week-old baby son until I ask him if he can sum up Scottish Mortgage in one sentence. He pulls a face but gets it in three. “Part of it is about backing convictions and doing what we said we would. We are very different from other large global trusts in not having the big FTSE 100 stocks like Shell or BP. We see the greatest opportunities in more exciting parts of the world that remain underrepresented in global stock markets.”

Thinking about it afterwards, I am not surprised that this bright, likeable but self-assured young manager has already made an impact on Scottish Mortgage.


This interview took place in September 2010 and all information contained is correct as at 31 August 2010.
 

Please remember that changing stock market conditions and currency exchange rates will affect the value of investments and any income from them. Investors may not get back the amount originally invested.

Scottish Mortgage invests in emerging markets where difficulties in dealing, settlement and custody could arise, resulting in a negative impact on the value of your investment. Investing in emerging markets may cause greater fluctuations in the value of the trust compared to investing in established markets.

The views that are expressed in this article should not be taken as fact and no reliance should be placed upon these when making investment decisions. They should not be considered as advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a particular investment.

This article contains information on investments which does not constitute independent investment research and accordingly it is not subject to the protections afforded to independent research.


Tom Slater
Tom graduated from the University of Edinburgh with a BSc in Computer Science with Mathematics in 2000.  He joined Baillie Gifford in 2000 and is an Investment Manager in the Long Term Global Growth team.  Tom became a CFA charterholder in 2003.

 

Comments

post a comment »

Thank you for your comment. We do get it wrong. This, in the nature of what we do, is not an infrequent occurrence. However, we try to get it “very right” when we get it right and also to keep an open mind. We do refer back to our original investment case when re-assessing companies. We do this against a set list of questions on a regular basis. If that original case has changed or has not worked out , we then have to acknowledge this and come to a decision. If you look at our top twenty holding over the last five years or so you can see that while we are long term holders there is change, although not fast paced, and that the list does have its own dynamic. We also use a “devil’s advocate” exercise, where we set out to deliberately disprove the investment. This, in some cases, helps and works. However, you are right, we do get it wrong and it is important that we remain rational and are not tripped up by success or get complacent. There are stocks where we have made mistakes – where have held on for too long, where we have been wrong about the investment case or where we have failed to spot opportunities and act in time. We can only do our best, and this we try to do. We certainly have not and never will have “cracked it”. Thank you for your interest. I have shown this response to the managers of Scottish Mortgage. Robert O’Riordan Client Director Investment Trusts

Robert O'Riordan

i am interested in your existing investments what happens if, despite all your wonderful research, ideas, etc, one of them starts to drift from perfection say, nintendo, where i have my doubts as to longer term outperformance -lack of world beating products, having to reduce prices to shift products, etc how do you reassess the existing portfolio for a possible disposal? may i caution the wonderful managers against a masters of the universe approach, which may have crept in recently? the investment gods may wake up, and decide you might not have cracked it after all

sue millard

Post your comment




Every comment will be reviewed by a moderator and published where appropriate. Your email address will not be disclosed.

 

Email Newsletter

Sign up for the latest updates via email

Sign up here ยป